International, Innovation and Investment in NATA

June 20, 2016

Greetings from Washington! With Congress still looking for a path forward on a long-term FAA reauthorization and the ongoing controversy surrounding the House Transportation Committee proposal to split the FAA into public and private organizations, it is as important as ever to remain engaged, informed and active in helping your NATA staff communicate directly and effectively with your nation’s lawmakers. Bill Deere provides the latest information as we go to press in his column. Please help us ensure our voice remains strong and consistent. NATA continues to make progress on several other fronts. Here are a few highlights.

NATA’s international presence continues to grow rapidly and Safety 1st products are leading the way. Tim Obitts, our Senior Vice President of Membership and Business Development and Mike France, NATA’s Managing Director of Safety and Training just recently returned from attending EBACE in Geneva, Switzerland. NATA’s presence and the buzz around our industry-leading Safety 1st training programs are driving greatly increased international interest and adoption. By working with the International Business Aviation Council to roll out the International Standard for Business Aircraft Handling (IS-BAH), NATA’s footprint is now rapidly growing abroad. To help showcase this continued growth, the NATA staff recently created an interactive electronic world map on NATA’s website for members to see where Safety 1st and NATA are expanding (www.fbostatus.com or www.groundhandlerstatus.com). Please take a look and see which of your competitors is taking advantage of this world class training. In addition, we can use member assistance in reaching out to those in the industry that are advertising NATA membership and Safety 1st Training, yet are not currently participating as either NATA members or Safety 1st graduates. This creates a potential competitive disadvantage for those continuing to support the expansion and continued improvement of this clearly top shelf training. Please let us know if you are aware of anyone mistakenly advertising their participation so we can follow up with some outreach to clear up any misunderstandings.

This quarter’s Aviation Business Journal features a very interesting article on JetSuite’s foray into scheduled Part 135 operations in the Western U.S. As the major airlines continue to reduce service to smaller markets and regional airlines struggle to fill cockpit seats, this is creating vacuums and for some, opportunities. NATA members are all very entrepreneurial and agile. This is clearly evident by those that successfully navigated the post financial crisis downturn. Member companies like JetSuite continue to look for opportunities to create their own niche and hopefully, success, in the marketplace. Many industry veterans might view these innovative efforts with some degree of skepticism, but let’s face it, the economy, consumers and the competitive landscape are all evolving and NATA’s members are always looking for new paths to ensure success.

Over these last few years, NATA’s voice in Washington has grown stronger; however, the need to ensure general aviation businesses continue as a stronger voice in Washington is greater than ever. As I often like to say, for some, a strong trade association is like insurance—you only need it when you need it. Fortunately for all of us, leaders from around the world recognize that by unifying business leaders around a common purpose, the industry’s destiny is much more controllable as long as the foundation is built upon an active and engaged membership.

As NATA kicks off the second annual Aviation Business Conference in Washington, please recommit to attending and supporting the unique opportunity this member-driven conference presents. The ability to speak directly with the TSA Administrator or the FAA’s top regulator or key Congressmen and Senators or to network with colleagues to generate new business opportunities are great reasons to attend this event. Take advantage of the convenience meetings such as this provide to foster multiple parts of your businesses’ growth strategy. The Aviation Business Conference is sure to provide many opportunities and attending helps support NATA’s efforts in Washington.

Please lend your support and plan to spend some time with NATA’s staff while attending any of our events. They all do a great job of helping tell the story of aviation businesses growing, innovating and investing in the economy, both here and around the world.

Republished from Q2 2016 Aviation Business Journal


Greetings from Washington!

April 22, 2016

As we go to press with this ABJ issue, NATA is in the midst of an intense lobbying campaign to help shape the House version of the FAA Reauthorization Bill titled, “The Aviation Innovation, Reform, and Reauthorization (AIRR) Act. Our Senior Vice President for Government and External Affairs, Bill Deere, will provide a fuller “from the trenches” view of our team’s lobbying efforts; but, before that, let’s cover a few points on NATA’s multi-year strategy that is now bearing fruit as we ensure that the Voice of Aviation Business is heard loudly and clearly by legislators and other policy makers. NATA began laying the groundwork for this ongoing effort almost four years ago. By quietly and respectfully building key relationships, NATA’s reputation, relevance and view as an “honest broker” in Washington is yielding needed access, at this critical time, that is vital to ensuring your voice is heard. Throughout this period, NATA’s team sought solutions and focused on listening to both our members and policy makers.

At the same time, through multiple meetings with lawmakers and administration officials, our staff worked diligently to educate the Hill and federal agencies on NATA’s unique and critical membership and how seemingly well-intended policy prescriptions can have a detrimental impact on small businesses.

This provided the framework to develop thoughtful and member-driven policy positions for this key legislation. Further, to be most effective, these are relationships that must endure over time. It is folly to view policy debates as zero-sum game transactions. While we sometimes disagree with key policy makers, we continue to be respectful and solution oriented. Why is this so critical? The politics of Washington will grind on long after the fate of one piece of legislation is decided. Maintaining long-term, respectful relationships is the most effective way to guarantee the enduring effectiveness of NATA long into the future.

House Transportation Committee Chairman Shuster released the specific language of the AIRR Act on February 3, 2016, then very quickly followed with a hearing six days later, and a full committee vote the following day. Although Chairman Shuster revealed some broad details over the last year, NATA did not have access to the bill’s language prior to its release. Going back to our point on enduring relationships, we made the decision to “keep our powder dry” and focus on the specifics of the bill prior to launching our advocacy campaign. We did this to ensure we maximized the efforts of NATA’s members at the most appropriate time so our message to lawmakers was not diluted by the passage of time or lack of volume. This strategy is paying off as we speak, but there is still a lot of fighting left to do to ensure aviation businesses remain a key part of this discussion.

With this as a backdrop, here are some key NATA observations on House Transportation Committee Chairman Congressman Bill Shuster’s AIRR Act:

  • On balance, the bill that passed the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee will, in the long term, hurt general aviation businesses. In the U.S., we enjoy the safest, most complex, most diverse system in the world with unparalleled access for general aviation. Contrary to views often driven by academics and economists, from an operator perspective, the air traffic control (ATC) system works very well.
  • A sound bite often tossed around Washington refers to our ATC system as based on “WWII technology.” I invite any proponents of corporatizing ATC to spend some time in any enroute center in the country, the FAA Command Center in Warrenton, VA, the William J. Hughes Technical Center in Atlantic City, NJ, or any of a host of truly high-technology Terminal Radar Approach Control facilities around the nation. Yes, we do use radar as one of the technologies to provide surveillance of aircraft. Other surveillance technologies, including GPS and multi-lateration, are also currently being “fused” with radar data at these high tech facilities. For a point of reference, we also continue to use electricity, first introduced into our homes in the late 19th century. So, just because a particular technology endures, does not necessarily minimize its relevance. ATC is difficult to discuss in sound bites or elevator pitches. It requires a deep operational perspective to truly understand the impacts of massive change to such a highly developed, safe and stable system.
  • We are in no way apologists for the FAA’s struggles in rolling out large modernization programs. The FAA is making progress, albeit slower than anticipated. This is frustrating. However, it is important to understand and reset expectations about the degree of change that is possible and appropriate. Over a decade ago, policy makers in Washington introduced the Next Generation Air Traffic Control System – NextGen. Looking back now, the expectations about the ability to modernize the air traffic control system were unrealistic; and corporatizing the current system will do nothing to ease the challenges ahead. In the meantime, and rarely acknowledged, the FAA successfully built and is integrating three foundational technologies that are providing the framework for future success. Enroute Automation Modernization (ERAM) is now operational at all of the nation’s high altitude enroute centers. The ADS-B ground network is in place and provides surveillance and vital safety information today. And finally, Digital Data Communications (DATACOMM) is rapidly growing at key airports, including Teterboro.
  • Somewhat surprising for a transportation issue, the debate has become infused with ideology, “government—bad, private enterprise—always good.” While we do agree that more private-sector practices would greatly benefit the FAA, we are also urging caution based on the history of other similar efforts. It’s clear that creating government-backed enterprises is no panacea. Organizations similar to the proposed ATC corporation include Sallie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Red Cross, and the Smithsonian and have met with very mixed results.
  • The proposed corporation will, over time, be dominated by the commercial airlines. The long-term impact of this is likely reduced service to small and rural communities with a further reduction of investment in safety-enhancing high technologies in those locations. Why would an airline-dominated board want to invest in areas of the country that they currently don’t, and likely never will, serve?
  • Absent the move to corporatize air traffic control in the U.S., many of the remaining provisions of the Shuster legislation are helpful and will improve the current system. This is a direct result of NATA’s approach to educating our nation’s policy makers on the vital role that general aviation businesses play in the nation’s economy.

Finally, please stay informed with all the tools provided by NATA. Visit http://www.nata.aero/nocorporation to contact your elected representatives and explain that the AIRR Act is bad for small businesses and general aviation. Actions like these are very effective and make a difference. Legislators listen to voters and job creators. Invite your Congressmen and Senators out to your business to show them how important the jobs you provide are to the local community. The time for engagement is upon us. Please stay in touch and let us know how we can help.

Republished from Q1 2016 Aviation Business Journal


Not The Answer for Air Traffic Control

March 21, 2016

The following is the full-length response opinion piece by Tom Hendricks’ excerpted by the Denver Post.

The Denver Post’s March 12th editorial, “The remedy for aviation delays,” endorsing a congressional proposal to create a federally chartered air traffic control corporation, is rooted in a number of factual errors that call into question the basis for the Post’s support. In fact, the creation of a federally chartered, not-for-profit air traffic control corporation will erode aviation system safety, stifle the deployment of new technologies and saddle the traveling public with ever increasing travel costs.

The Post’s first factual misstatement centers on the corporation’s governance. Federally chartering an air traffic control corporation, the Post implies, means the U.S. government somehow supervises it. While such corporations are required to provide annual independent audits and reports to Congress, controversies surrounding such corporations often come down to issues of managerial accountability and fiduciary responsibility. The Post itself noted the record of another such corporation, the Post Office. But other examples include Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Red Cross and the Smithsonian. It is notable that each of these federally chartered institutions have required in their history some form of government intervention.

Next, the Post implies the corporation would be overseen by the government. Wrong. The corporation would be controlled by a 13-member board of aviation insiders. In fact, one indisputable fact at the legislative hearing on the proposal – the nation’s airlines would have effective control of the board.

The Post also buys into an argument put forward by many of the principal supporters of this proposal, largely academics and economists, about the level of modernization of the air traffic control system. These experts sorely lack the necessary operational experience and expertise required to develop a fully integrated perspective of the “puts and takes” critical to ensuring a balanced approach to safeguarding the unprecedented level of safety performance that is the hallmark of the U.S. air traffic control system.

Among other things, this lack of real world depth of experience blithely leads to simplistic pronouncements such as “a blip is just a blip” when referring to aircraft displayed on air traffic control systems and similarly, that the U.S. is “using World War II technology” as the foundation for our air traffic control system. These views are simplistic, uninformed and clearly point to an academic, not operational view of reality.

The incredibly robust U.S. air traffic control system is modern, highly-integrated and provides for an extremely high level of continuity in the face of disruptive meteorological and technological challenges. This system was designed with the predominant users of the system in mind – major airlines. One must only visit state-of-the-art FAA facilities like the Atlanta Terminal Radar Approach Control Facility, the FAA Command Center in Warrenton, Virginia, the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center in New Jersey and others to realize that these extremely robust and modern facilities leave “World War II” technology in the dust. These facilities, along with the Enroute Automation Modernization-equipped high altitude enroute air traffic control centers, are already fusing multiple sensor sources, including radar, Global Positioning System inputs and other sources into these highly-integrated systems.

We understand the idea of creating an air traffic control corporation is appealing to many, including the Post, as a way to address budgetary stability at the FAA. But doesn’t the Department of Defense deserve a little budgetary stability? What about federal law enforcement or programs to assist the poor with their heating bills, could they use a little budget stability? The FAA isn’t the only part of the federal budget that needs relief from political in-fighting over the budget.

Air traffic control is a monopoly and the governance of this proposed corporation is already precooked in the proposal endorsed by the Post to pick its winners and losers, leaving the consumer and general aviation largely on the outside looking in.


A Time to Reflect… Now Let’s Focus On the Next 75 Years!

December 28, 2015

 

December 28, 2015 marks a very auspicious accomplishment for NATA. We are very pleased to celebrate our 75th Anniversary as the leading voice of aviation businesses in our country, and beyond. In this issue of the Aviation Business Journal, please take a few minutes to read about our storied history in a great article authored by Paul Seidenman & David J. Spanovich, “NATA – For 75 Years, The Voice of General Aviation Business.”

Reflecting back on the early days of what we know today as NATA, I remain amazed and proud that industry leaders—with a clear vision and mission—organized, united and led NATA’s members on a path that continues to ensure our voices are heard clearly in the aviation industry, the Halls of Congress, before federal agencies, and in the states. We will forever be indebted to William A. Ong, Leslie H. Bowman and many others whose vision and dedication remain the hallmarks of our association.

However, these great leaders truly owe their success—and the continuing success of NATA—to the scores of current and former volunteer leaders who over these past 75 years generously donated their time and resources to actively help guide our efforts. These volunteers include NATA board members, committee members and the many others we call upon to provide views on a host of issues. As I’ve repeatedly said over these last few years, this is your association and volunteering to participate helps guarantee our success well into the future. The NATA staff needs your expertise when advocating with our colleagues, at the FAA, and on Capitol Hill. Clear, well-defined policy priorities succeed when driven by NATA members.

Looking ahead, the future of NATA is bright as we embark on our next 75 years. There are several guideposts that will help ensure we remain relevant, respected and a valuable resource for our members and the nation’s policymakers.

  • Growing our suite of safety enhancing training products will be front and center moving forward. Safety 1st is recognized as the gold standard for general aviation businesses. NATA will continue to thoughtfully expand this highly beneficial program into other areas to ensure our members continue to enjoy cutting edge products that drive safety improvements and translate to the bottom line. This will become particularly more important considering FAA Administrator Michael Huerta’s commitment to moving the agency from an “enforcement” regime to one of “compliance.” This “sea change” dovetails extremely well with safety management principles now rapidly maturing. Even though the FAA’s philosophy shift will likely take years to fully implement, programs like Safety 1st will become ever more vital to ensuring our members properly manage risk in their businesses.
  • Moving forward, NATA must remain agile in a changing business environment, must stay relevant to both members and in policy debates in Washington and beyond and most importantly, must continue to be responsive to our members’ needs. We will work with NATA’s board to ensure our by-laws and organizational structure continue to demonstrate the
    most effectiveness and value for NATA’s members.
  • NATA will continue to actively manage strategic rela­tionships to ensure our voice is heard. We’ll do this by being good listeners, solution-oriented, non-partisan and closing on commitments we make. These are long-term commitments that will garner respect and influ­ence to ensure The Voice of Aviation Business remains a key player in Washington and beyond.
  • The recently announced purchase of the Independent Fixed Base Operators Association (IFBOA) is already jumpstarting our membership rolls and bringing a vitally important constituency to NATA, ensuring we truly speak as one voice on Capitol Hill. In the coming months, this move, along with our updated products and services will ensure we remain a vibrant and grow­ing trade association for many years to come.

In closing, it’s an honor to lead your trade association and to work with our highly dedicated NATA staff and volun­teers. This is a winning combination that is going to ensure our future remains bright. Please participate and remain engaged in NATA’s activities. We need your great ideas and guidance to help ensure The Voice of Aviation Business grows even stronger for our members!

Republished from Q4 2015 Aviation Business Journal


Greetings from Washington!

July 2, 2014

NATA is off to a great start in 2014 and there’s much activity to update our membership on.

We’re thrilled with the arrival of Bill Deere as our Senior Vice President of Government and External Affairs. Bill brings a wealth of Washington policy experience with him. He comes to NATA from the U.S. Telecom Association and did previous stints at the Department of State as a Deputy Assistant Secretary responsible for Senate liaison, two tours at the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association in their government affairs shop and also as a member of the staff of Iowa Representative Jim Lightfoot. It was here that Bill gained valuable expertise working with the House Appropriations Committee. This experience will serve NATA and our members well as we approach key legislation, including the upcoming reauthorization of the FAA. Bill and his lovely wife, Theresa, reside in Silver Spring, Maryland, so Bill is very much looking forward to an easier commute with our move to Washington.

Speaking of the move, we were very pleased to sell our current location last fall and are currently leasing that facility until we move. Our new location is in the heart of Washington, on Connecticut Avenue, one half block from Lafayette Park and the White House. We’ll be right across the street from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. So, if you’re in the area, please plan to stop by our new home! Our architect is designing some extra space for members to “hang their hats” when they’re in the DC area. This move is part of our strategic repositioning in Washington and will serve us well for the long term.

Here’s a quick rundown on what we’ve been working on so far this year:

• We instituted our new Member Support Level Program in January. Our aim was to “unbundle” our products and services and permit our members to have more of a choice in how they support NATA. This has been a great success and we’re seeing more and more companies select the levels of support that provide the most value for their individual businesses, all while receiving significant discounts.

• February included a meeting with Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx where we had a full discussion on NATA’s mission and the importance of General Aviation to the nation’s economy; and we offered NATA’s help in developing and implementing policies that improve aviation safety and help our members win in the marketplace. I was also fortunate to attend the Bob Hoover gala that included a dinner where several notable inductees entered the Hoover Hall of Honor, followed the next evening by a tribute and the premier of a Paramount Documentary of Bob’s lifetime achievements. Bob is a legend in our aviation world and it was an honor to join many other heroes such as astronauts Jim Lovell, Gene Cernan and Buzz Aldrin. Several key NATA members were also in attendance.

• March started off quickly with the Aviation Business and Legislative Conference. Although we were challenged by miserable weather in Washington, the event was a great success. Other visits that month included the Women in Aviation, International Conference in Orlando, a speech to the Minnesota Aviation Trades Association, and a panel at Aviation Pros Live in Las Vegas. While in Washington for a few days in between traveling, I was interviewed by the FAA’s Management Advisory Council on a wide range of issues, including the possibility of FAA structural reform, something that’s been gaining traction in Washington, D.C. policy circles.

• April began with my first visit to Sun ‘N Fun in Lakeland, Florida. It was a fabulous event! I flew down in a Saratoga and was on a Town Hall panel with the co-chair of the House General Aviation Caucus, Representative Sam Graves (MO), AOPA President Mark Baker and HAI President Matt Zuccaro.

Just last month, we were once again excited to host a fundraising event for the Veterans Airlift Command (VAC) and other veterans groups at the Air Charter Summit. Last year, working with VAC’s Chairman, CEO and Founder Walt Fricke, we raised over $20,000 for this incredibly worthy organization. I am proud to report that we raised nearly $50,000 this year. As a long-serving veteran, I have a special place in my heart for these groups. I spent nearly nine years on active duty in the Navy and another eighteen in the Air Force Reserve. In fact, the week before the Air Charter Summit, I joined my Navy squadron mates from 30 years ago for a reunion in Newport, RI. Our host was the squadron’s “youngster,” who is now a Rear Admiral and President of the Naval War College. Thirty years ago in April, we lost one of the finest fighter pilots, naval officers, fathers and gentlemen I’ve ever met. Lieutenant Commander Tim Murphy died in a tragic aircraft accident during a catapult shot in the Indian Ocean in month four of a five-month cruise to the Northern Arabian Sea. Tim had a wonderful wife and four young children and it was simply devastating to all involved. His entire family joined us in Newport in June to toast a few in “Muff’s” honor and memory. For veterans, our service is mostly defined by honor, fellowship and sacrifice. This is why our support of the VAC is so exciting, heartwarming and a privilege for us all. Please give this worthy cause your support!

Visit or return to NATA’s website: http://www.nata.aero


Year 1 Report: On Course and Climbing

September 9, 2013

Well, it’s been one year since I took over the helm at the National Air Transportation Association and I thought it was a good time to update our members on where we’ve come and where we’re headed!

In the past year, we have made many positive changes toward making our organization more responsive to the needs of our members. We brought in top-notch leadership with Jim Coon from the Hill and John McGraw from FAA, reorganized and consolidated our committees under the watchful eye of Amy Koranda, and began implementing a new strategic plan. We are offering new membership benefits as well as bolstering our safety programs.

I have also spent a lot of time on the road, updating our members in Van Nuys, talking air safety in Moline, strategizing with industry leaders in OshKosh, and attending the Tarkio airshow. I was able to meet many of you during my travels and participate in a number of lively town halls at airports around the country. Visits like these are invaluable and enable me to learn firsthand what’s on your mind.

We continue to work hard taking your aviation industry concerns straight to the decision makers on Capitol Hill. And we are tackling a number of issues that affect our member businesses – airport and land use, security, taxation, aircraft noise and emissions, and other priorities that arise – both at the federal and state level.

The federal excise tax issue is one area where we have made considerable progress. We are working closely with the IRS to address new interpretations of tax laws that are detrimental to air charter and aircraft management businesses. FETs are now on the IRS Guidance Priorities List, which will enable government officials to move more quickly in resolving this matter.

NATA continues to oppose the $100 departure fee on certain segments of aviation. And we will continue to sound the alarm about a looming pilot shortage across the entire industry. One of our top priorities is to do all we can to attract, train and retain the next generation of aviation professionals to the profession that we all love.

Looking ahead, we are closely watching Congress. It is our hope that the House and Senate will soon pass a continuing resolution to fund the federal government beyond the fiscal year, which ends on September 30. Beyond that is sequestration. Earlier this year, NATA helped to lead a strong grassroots effort to keep open 149 contract towers that were slated to close as part of the Federal Aviation Administration’s sequestration plans. Congress passed legislation that allowed the agency to move funds to keep the towers open until the end of the fiscal year. But sequestration will last another nine years unless Congress and the Administration reach an alternative budget agreement. It doesn’t look like this will be resolved any time soon.

You can rest assured that NATA will continue to work with our contacts in other aviation associations and on Capitol Hill to find a more permanent solution to this problem.

Of course to some of you, what goes on at the federal level isn’t your biggest concern. That is why we continue to work with our partners in the State Advocacy Network to address burdensome regulations and legislation at the state and local level that affect your bottom line.

While we make changes to provide better service to our members, some things will never change. NATA will continue to make safety our top priority. We have updated our successful Safety 1st program, and have launched the Supervisor Online Training as well as our online Aircraft Flight Coordinator Training.

As we move forward, NATA will do whatever we can to help shape policies and legislation that safeguard our members’ ability to win in the marketplace and we will educate local, state, and federal elected officials about the vital role aviation businesses play in their communities. And above all, we will continue to be the voice of aviation business.

As always, thanks for your steadfast support. I hope to hear from you. Please let us know how we can help!

Tom

Visit or return to NATA site: http://www.nata.aero. Follow NATA on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/nataaero and Like Us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/nataaero


From Oshkosh and Tarkio: Air Shows, Barbecues and Fellowship with Aviation Enthusiasts

August 2, 2013

After a successful NATA Board of Directors Meeting in Minneapolis in early July, I had an opportunity to travel to Tarkio, Missouri where House Small Business Committee Chairman Sam Graves hosted a fly-in and air show in his hometown. Now, I have to admit I had never been to Tarkio, but it was a fabulous venue that showcased the passion and diversity of our great general aviation community.  From war birds to Stearmans to aerobatic helicopters, it was fantastic to smell a little avgas and jet fuel in my nostrils once again.  And the aviation stories and the barbecue were great too!

While in Tarkio, I participated in an aviation panel with House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster, Illinois Congressman Adam Kinzinger and the leaders of most of today’s general and business aviation associations. 

This week, I spoke on another panel at the EAA’s 2013 AirVenture in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.  AirVenture is one of the best events of the year and it always reminds me just why I first started flying many years ago.  During  my presentations both in Tarkio and Oshkosh, I took a few minutes to discuss the critical role that NATA members play in building their businesses at our country’s airports.  Our members are job creators.  And NATA is here every day engaging in the legislative and regulatory processes because we fully understand the impact that laws and rules have on your bottom line. At both gatherings, I also talked about the importance of the entire aviation community working together to ensure that we can successfully drive aviation policies.  Our nation must have a vibrant aviation system that spans all spectrums – from experimental, to business, to commercial.  It is critically important not just for our associations’ members, but to our nation’s economy. 

Ben Franklin famously said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”  The same is true in Washington on policy matters that affect our industry.  Today, the leaders of general aviation associations recognize the need to work more closely than ever before.  This means more frequent and robust communications between our association leaders, staffs, and members.  We are already seeing success using this strategy.

When I wrapped up my talks at AirVenture and Congressman Graves’ fly in, I spoke of educating our policy makers and the general public on the vital importance of aviation to our nation’s economy, of developing and introducing aviation to young people, of building a strong culture of safety and responsibility, and of our need to focus and work together for the future of our great aviation community.  This is our formula for winning in the future.  I’ll be making several member visits and participating in town hall events in the coming weeks and months.  I look forward to smelling some more avgas and eating some more barbecue.  Check out our website at http://www.nata.aero for the dates.  If you are in the area, please stop by.  Thanks for your steadfast support and please let us know how we can help! 

Tom

Visit or return to NATA site: www.nata.aero. Follow NATA on Twitter www.twitter.com/nataaero and Like Us on Facebook www.facebook.com/nataaero